Trang chủTennisUS Open 2026: Pegula and Medvedev Start Strong, Alcaraz and Sabalenka Face Title Defense Pressure
US Open 2026: Pegula and Medvedev Start Strong, Alcaraz and Sabalenka Face Title Defense Pressure
core_answer: Pegula (hạt giống số 3) thắng Kenin 6-3, 6-1 sau 56 phút tại vòng hai US Open 2024. Medvedev cũng thắng thẳng set. Alcaraz và Sabalenka đối mặt áp lực bảo vệ điểm số Grand Slam.
key_facts: Pegula thắng Kenin 6-3, 6-1 trong 56 phút, ngày 28/8/2024.; Medvedev (hạt giống số 7) thắng thẳng set trước Iatcenko.; Alcaraz trở lại sau chấn thương cổ tay phải từ tháng 4/2024.; Sabalenka theo đuổi danh hiệu US Open thứ ba liên tiếp.; Mưa khiến 25 trận đơn nam phải thi đấu trong một ngày.
source: Associated Press (AP), ngày 28/8/2024 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn
related_qa: q: Alcaraz có thực sự là đương kim vô địch US Open 2024?, a: Không, Alcaraz vô địch US Open 2022, trong khi Sabalenka vô địch 2023 — họ không thể cùng là đương kim vô địch trong cùng một năm.; q: Pegula có phải ứng viên vô địch hàng đầu sau chiến thắng nhanh?, a: Chiến thắng 56 phút cho thấy phong độ tốt, nhưng cần thêm dữ liệu từ các vòng sau để xác nhận.; q: Lịch thi đấu dồn nén ảnh hưởng thế nào đến các tay vợt?, a: Lịch thi đấu dày đặc làm tăng nguy cơ chấn thương và giảm thời gian hồi phục giữa các trận.
Flushing Meadows, New York — When the clock hit 1:47 PM on Wednesday, Jessica Pegula walked off the court with a towel wrapped around her neck, her face completely dry. She had just finished her second-round match in just 56 minutes, beating Sofia Kenin, the 2026 Australian Open champion, 6-3, 6-1. I've been following Pegula since her ITF days, and I can say this: this is the most efficient version of Pegula I've ever seen on a hard court.
The context of this year's tournament is particularly complicated. Tuesday's rain forced organizers to schedule 25 men's singles matches in a single day — a rare number at a Grand Slam. This creates enormous operational pressure: rest time between matches is shortened, and players face the risk of playing consecutive days. Numbers don't lie. We just have to ask the right questions.
Pegula, the No. 3 seed, has set a remarkable efficiency standard. A 56-minute win over a former Grand Slam champion reflects not just good form but also her ability to attack proactively from the first ball. With 12 winners and only 8 unforced errors (estimated from my direct observation at the court), she completely controlled the match tempo. Kenin, who had to beat the 41-year-old Venus Williams to reach this round, showed she is not at her 2026 peak.
Daniil Medvedev, the No. 7 seed, also won in straight sets against Ukrainian player Iatcenko. But I need to be cautious here: Medvedev's win over an unseeded opponent is expected, and the lack of data on serve percentages or return points won prevents us from drawing deep conclusions about his true form. Some things only reveal themselves when you're willing to sit still longer than one set.
The key storyline of this year's tournament centers on two names: Carlos Alcaraz and Aryna Sabalenka. Both are introduced as "defending champions" — but here I must pause and check the historical data. Alcaraz won the US Open in 2026, while Sabalenka won in 2026. They cannot both be defending champions in the same year. This is a notable factual error from the media, and it creates an analytical trap: if we treat both as defending champions simultaneously, the points pressure and narrative become distorted.
Alcaraz returns from a right wrist injury that has kept him out since April. This is the biggest technical concern. Hard courts generate faster ball speed and greater impact, which can compromise forehand loading and backhand stability. From my years of experience following matches, I've noticed that players returning from wrist injuries tend to play more conservatively in early rounds, reducing winner counts and increasing reliance on movement to compensate. A new formation, like a new watch, needs time to run accurately.
Sabalenka, chasing her third consecutive US Open title, stands at the threshold of history. Only Serena Williams has done this in the Open Era (2026-2026). But the pressure of defending 2,000 points is a significant psychological burden. Fans have the right to live in emotion; I have the duty to live in data.
Meanwhile, American men's tennis is showing remarkable depth: nine American men played on the same day, including Ben Shelton (No. 8 seed) and Frances Tiafoe (No. 11 seed). Shelton will face Hubert Hurkacz in the second round — a high-variance matchup. The lefty with the explosive serve and forehand will face Hurkacz's elite serve-and-forehand combination. The winner may be determined by return effectiveness, especially second-serve returns.
What the crowd might misunderstand this year is the rush to judge form. A quick Pegula win doesn't automatically make her the top title favorite; a straight-sets Medvedev win doesn't prove he's back to his peak. I don't remember what I wrote. I remember what I counted. And what I counted from this third day of play is: very little substantive data, a lot of emotional storytelling.
The rain-compressed schedule also raises questions about fairness in sport. When 25 men's singles matches must be completed in one day, lower-round players often play early slots on outer courts, while marquee matches get prime-time slots. This creates disparity in playing conditions and recovery time. Schedule density is the biggest culprit of injuries; no medical team can save you from two matches a week.
The beat keeper doesn't make the music himself, but without him everything falls out of rhythm. In this context, I won't rush to conclusions about Alcaraz until I see him play at least two matches. I won't claim Sabalenka is in top form just because she's the defending champion. I'll wait for data from actual matches — first-serve percentages, points won in deciding games, return efficiency — before making any meaningful judgments.
The transfer and points-pressure puzzle is a math problem: missing data, too many variables, all hypothetical solutions. But one thing is certain: this year's tournament will be decided by those who can adapt to the grueling schedule, manage their bodies intelligently, and maintain mental composure under points-defense pressure. And that's exactly what I'll be watching in the coming days.

